Monday, January 4, 2010

National Casualty Insurance Is It True That Withdrawing Troops Will Lead To Far Greater Casualties And Larger Threat To National Security?

Is it true that withdrawing troops will lead to far greater casualties and larger threat to national security? - national casualty insurance

Nobody knows, but the argument is why we have troops in Iraq. But since it the same as those that predict that the Iraqis welcomed us with open arms and throw flowers at us and this war will go in six months to the end, I would not trust all their predictions of what my horoscope says about me.

However, the current strategy is not working, and I think it is a tactic which has found repeated violations or a sign of stupidity or insanity. The only way to know what happens when we pull the troops out, that if we pull the troops out.

4 comments:

warlordn... said...

will be much lower, but nothing to worry about, and national security will be better after retirement. The Iraqis will probably be divided into several factions and groupings will be violent. Factioning really not our fault that, because the British are, however, those who have taken over and shared many different nations in one state. There is no way to Iraq without end have been at least one of the mass genocide peeing outside of Turkey, so that Kurdistan, Iraq from a dictatorship.

If someone thinks that they are due to the termination of employment, which creates a greater threat to national security, idiots and should never be elected again. Some examples ...
1 - IRA split from virtually disappeared with the UK, Ireland
2 - The Chinese Communists are originally only wanted a democracy in his country and his party in question, the party in the 2nd World War II had barely 5,000 people, and not a threat to the Nationalist China

Badjuju said...

No, terrorism has increased seven-fold. We borrow almost $ 2 billion per day, pay taxes and reduce our politicians. Diplomats and military advisers have repeatedly over the years we have seen as occupiers (for us) and that the only way that Iraq can recover, it can be heard by the majority of the Iraqi people said - and share. Often people do not know what it will cost in our area and how our vulneralbility, the national army and the economic system exhausted to speak, that we are here. We are breeding hatred in the world to stay.

Badjuju said...

No, terrorism has increased seven-fold. We borrow almost $ 2 billion per day, pay taxes and reduce our politicians. Diplomats and military advisers have repeatedly over the years we have seen as occupiers (for us) and that the only way that Iraq can recover, it can be heard by the majority of the Iraqi people said - and share. Often people do not know what it will cost in our area and how our vulneralbility, the national army and the economic system exhausted to speak, that we are here. We are breeding hatred in the world to stay.

beta_hat said...

It can lead to higher losses for the Iraqis. But when you have heard the last time a U.S. politician, who shed a tear, because the Iraqis to die, too? You know what the number of Iraqi dead? Of course not, but lead the U.S. government does not even bother to statistics. Johns Hopkins and other academic groups had to go and make assumptions on their own investigations.

Post a Comment